Human Agency
Judgment, problem formation, authorship, delegation, expertise formation, and the changing scale of individual agency.
Research
The Intellectual Agenda of AI Humanism studies how increasingly capable machines alter the development of people and institutions.
The Capability-Conversion Problem
Under what conditions does an increase in machine capability produce a durable increase in human or institutional capability?
These are distinct constructs. Machine capability concerns what a system can do. AI-assisted performance concerns what a person or institution can accomplish while using it. Durable capability concerns what remains as a capacity to understand, judge, create, coordinate, learn, decide, and act.
The research question is therefore larger than whether AI improves an outcome. It asks what changes in the person or institution that produced it.
Research domains
Judgment, problem formation, authorship, delegation, expertise formation, and the changing scale of individual agency.
Authority, accountability, organizational design, expertise, decision rights, and institutional learning.
Informational abundance, verification, expertise, knowledge creation, preservation, participation, and understanding.
Mandates, bounded authority, evidence of execution, correction, adaptive governance, and the feasible domain of delegation.
Current inquiries
When does AI-assisted performance produce transferable human capability, and when does the benefit remain dependent on the machine?
How does repeated AI use change expertise formation, independent reasoning, problem formulation, and judgment over time?
Which institutional arrangements convert machine capability into durable organizational capability while preserving authority and accountability?
As information, synthesis, and execution become more abundant, which human capabilities become more consequential?
When does abundant machine synthesis deepen expertise and discovery, and when does it weaken the knowledge on which independent judgment depends?
When does greater ability to direct, observe, and revise machine execution expand the work institutions can responsibly delegate?
Research approach
AI Humanism is interdisciplinary because its questions cross levels of analysis. Method follows the question, but the research program shares several commitments.
Immediate task outcomes and durable human or institutional development answer different questions. Research should distinguish them.
Expertise, judgment, dependency, institutional memory, and adaptive capacity emerge through repeated interaction rather than a single task.
Effects on individuals, teams, organizations, professions, and institutions may differ and interact.
Assumptions should remain visible, evidence distinguishable from interpretation, and conclusions open to revision when stronger evidence emerges.
AI Humanism advances when better evidence changes its conclusions.